Effect of cutting management and nitrogen levels on biomass and proximate quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare) in saline soil

Authors

  • R.K.YADAV
  • ASHOK KUMAR
  • D. LAL t

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v48i3.3077

Keywords:

Barley, Biomass production, Cutting management, ForageIGrain yield, Nitrogen, Proximate quality

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabr) seasons of 1997 1998 to 1999 2000 on an alluvial loamy sand saline soil at Hisar, to find out the effect of cutting management and nitrogen levels on biomass prc duction and proximate quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Dry forage yield of barley was 6.3% higher when harvested once at 50% heading compared with 2 cuttings at 60 days of growth and 50% heading. The total biom ass was 3.8% higher when harvested for grain purpose compared to the treatment in which the crop was first har vested for forage at 60 days and subsequently left for grain purpose. However, no significant differences were ob served in the yield equivalents of barley grown for grain purpose or green forage and grain. Application of N signifi cantly increased the yield from 22.5 q/ha with 60 kg Nlha to 29.3 qlha with 80 kg Nlha. The protein and mineral matter contents were higher in grains (9.2 and 4.7%) and fodder (5.3 and 10.3%) harvested at the early stages than 9.0 and 4.6% in grain and 4.9 and 9.8% in fodder at the late stage. However, the fibre and lignin contents were more in fodder harvested at later stages. With increasing levels of N application, the mineral matter remained unaffected, while the crude protein and lignin contents increased and fibre decreased in both fodder as well as grain.

References

AOAC. 1990. Oficial Methods of Analysis, edn 12. Association of Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.

Gupta, P.C., Khatta, V.K. and Mandal, A.B. 1988. Analytical Tech- niques in Animal Nutrition. Directorate of Publications, Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, p. 98.

M ~E.V. and~~ . ~ f f 1977.~ croD.

~ G.~. ~ salt tolerance=.urrent assessment. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers 113 :(IR2) :1 15-1 34.

Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. and Kenny, D.R. 1982. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I and 11, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Paq.ear, V.S., Tewatia, B.S. and Lodhi, G.P. 1999. Chemical compo- sition and dry matter digestibility of some varieties of sor- ghum harvested at different stages. Forage Research 24 : 209-2 11

YADAV ETAL. [Vol. 48, No. 3

Rawat, C.R. 1998. Nitrogen requirement of barley and oat for feed Taneja, K.D., Gill, P.S. and Solanki, K.R. 1981. Possibility of tak-

and fodder. Forage Research 23 :135-140. ing fodder in addition to seed from barley (Honlewn vulgare Shah, W.A. and Hassan, B. 1999. Grain and fodder yield of oats as L.) and oats (Avem sativa) under different levels of nitrogen. influenced by nitrogen levels and cutting schedules. Fomge Forage Research 7 :3 1-38. Research 24 :185-190. Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, H.B. and Lewis, B.A. 1991. Method of Sharma, S.K. and Bhunia, S.R. 2001. Response of oat (Avena sa- dietary fibre. NDF and non-starch polysaccharides in rela-

tiva) to cutting management, method of sowing and, nitro- tion to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74 :

gen. Indian Journal of Agronomy 46 :563-567. . 3,583-3,597. .'

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

R.K.YADAV, ASHOK KUMAR, & D. LAL t. (2001). Effect of cutting management and nitrogen levels on biomass and proximate quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare) in saline soil. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 48(3), 48_3 . https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v48i3.3077