Effect of weed control and sowing methods on production potential of wheat (lkiticum aestivum)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v48i3.3075Keywords:
Sowing methods, Weed control, WheatAbstract
A field experiment was conducted during winter seasons of 1999 2000 and 2000 2001 to find out effect of weed control and sowing methods on production potential of Lok 1 wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori Paol.). Twentyfour treatment combinations consisted of 8 weed control treatments and 3 methods of sowing. On pooled basis, the monocot and dicot weeds constituted 23.4 and 76.6% weed population respectively. Tank mix application of metsulfuron methyl and isoproturon (4 750 ha) recorded the lowest weed dry matter which was at par with other tank mix applications but statistically superior to individual applications. Among individual applica tions, isoproturon was found statistically superior in reducing weed dry matter. The weed control treatments re corded significantly higher yield attributes, yield, net returns and benefit : cost ratio compared to weedy check. Ap plication of metsulfuron methyl isoproturon (4 750 ha) recorded maximum values of all these parameters which were at par with other tank mix applications but found statistically superior to individual applications. Among individual applications, isoproturon recorded maximum value but found statistically equivalent to other individually applied herbicides. The maximum values of yield attributes, yield, net return and benefit : cost ratio were recorded in cross sowing (22.5 cm x 22.5 cm) compared to normal (22.5 cm) and close (1 8 cm) line sowing. Cross sowing methods also recorded lowest weed dry matter.References
Dhaliwal, G.S. and Kler, D.S. 1995. Principles ofAgricultura1 Ecol- ogy. Himalayan Publishing House, Bombay.
Gill, H.S. 1980. Effective weed conMin rabi I&ian Fa,,,,-ing 30(7) :4143. Gupta, O.P. 2000. The functional features of common herbicides (In) Modem Weed Management, pp. 188-204. Agrobios, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Jadhao, S.L. and Nalamwar, R.V. 1993. Respone of wheat (Triticwn aestivwn) genotypes to planting method and manual weed- ing. Indian Journal ofAgronomy 38(3) :382-385. Johri, A.K. and Singh, G. 1991. Herbicide-cum-cultural weed con- trol in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Indian Journal oj Agronomy 36(Suppl.) :54-59. Kurnawat, R.N. 1997. Productivity of wheat (Triticunl aesrivum L.) as influenced by isoproturon and 2,4-Dmixture under differ- ent methods of sowing. M.Sc. (Agric.) Thesis, Rajasthan Agriculture University, Udaipur. Malik, R.S., Malik, R.K., Panwar, R.S. and Bhan,V.M. 1989. The influence of surfactant on the performance of grass herbi- cides applied under complex weed flora situation in wheat.
Indian Journal of Agronomy 34(2) :21 7-221.
Malik, R.S., Yadav, A., Malik, R.K. and Panwar, R.S. 1999. Perfor-mance fo tralkoxydim and triallate alone and their mixtures with isoprotoron on weed control in wheat. Indian Journal of Weed Science 31(1 and 2) :44-46.
Sardana, V., Walia, U.S. and Mahajan, G. 2001. Management of broad leaf weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Indian Jouranl of Weed Science 33(1,2) :69-7 1.
September 20031 WHEAT RESPONSE TO WEED CONTROL AND SOWING METHOD
Sidhu, D., Walia, U.S. and Brar, L.S. 2000. Herbicidal control of wheat. Indian Joumnl of Weed Science 29(3.4) :2$5-206. Rumex spinosus (Kandiali palak) in wheat (Triticum Wur, S.S., Pandey, LB., Singh, S.J. and Mishra, S.S. 1996. Re- aestivwn L.). Indian Jounurl of Weed Science 32(3,4) :156-sponse of wheat (Triticwn aestivwn) varieties to weed man-




