Integrated use of organic and inorganic nutrient sources influences the nutrient content, uptake and nutrient use efficiencies of fodder oats (Avena sativa)

Authors

  • DINESH KUMAR
  • MAGAN SINGH
  • MANISH KUSHWAHA
  • GOVIND MAKARANA
  • M.R. YADAV

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v66i4.2875

Keywords:

Agronomic efficiency, Green fodder yield, Nutrient uptake, Oats, Panchagavya

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out during the winter (rabi) seasons of 201819 and 201920 at Karnal, Haryana (India), to study the residual effect of maize (Zea mays L.) varieties and integrated nutrient-management practices on nutrient content, uptake and nutrient use efficiencies of fodder oats (Avena sativa L.). The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with 3 replications. In main plot, the residual effect of 3 maize varieties (V , African Tall; V , 1 2 J 1006; V , P 3396) on oats and in subplot, 4 nutrient-management practices (N , Control; N , 100% RDF; N , 3 0 1 2 75% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) + plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPR) + Panchagavya spray; N , 3 50% RDF + 25% FYM + PGPR + Panchagavya spray) were studied. Results showed that different maize varieties were found statistically ineffective in producing the residual effect on yield, nutrient content and uptake of fodder oats. Among the nutrient management practices, an application of 75% RDF + PGPR + Panchagavya spray re- sulted in significantly higher green fodder yield at I cut, II cut and total (36.7, 26.4 and 63.1 t/ha, respectively) as compared to the control and 100% RDF. Application of 75% RDF + PGPR + Panchagavya spray and 50% RDF + 25% FYM + PGPR + Panchagavya spray significantly enhanced the nutrient content and uptake of fodder oats over the control. The maximum nutrient-use efficiencies, viz. partial factor productivity (69.6 kg DM/kg NPK ap- plied), agronomic efficiency (26.8 kg DM/kg NPK applied) and recovery efficiency (114.1%) were also found with the application of 75% RDF + PGPR + Panchagavya spray, while the least values of these efficiencies were noted under 100% RDF through chemical fertilizers. Overall, the application of 75% RDF + PGPR + Panchagavya spray may be recommended to enhance the yield, nutrient content, uptake and nutrient-use efficiencies of fodder oats, besides replacing 25% RDF through chemical fertilizers.

References

Bandyopadhyay, K.K., Misra, A.K., Ghosh, P.K. and Hati, K.M. 2010. Effect of integrated use of farmyard manure and chemical fertilizers on soil physical properties and productivity of soybean. Soil and Tillage Research 110: 115125.

Chesnin, L. and Yien, C.H. 1950. Turbidimetric determination of available sulphates. Soil Science Society of America Journal

: 149151.

Fageria, N.K. and Baligar, V.C. 2003. Methodology for evaluation of lowland rice genotypes for nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition 26(6): 13151333.

Fageria, N.K. and Baligar, V.C. 2005. Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advances in Agronomy 88: 97185.

Fixen, P., Brentrup, F., Bruulsema, T., Garcia, F., Norton, R. and Zingore, S. 2014. Nutrient/ fertilizer use efficiency: measurement, current situation and trends. (In) Managing Water and Fertilizer for Sustainable Agricultural Intensification, pp. 8

Drechsel, P., Heffer, P., Magen, H., Mikkelsen, R. and Wichelns, D. (Eds.), IFA, IWMI, IPNI and IPI.

Hanlon, E.A. 1998. Elemental determination by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. (In) Handbook of Methods for Plant Analysis, pp. 157164. Kalra, Y.P. (Ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.

IGFRI. 2018. Vision 2050. p. 4. ICAR Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Jackson M.L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. p. 498. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.

Johnston, A.E., Poulton, P.R. and Coleman, K. 2009. Soil organic matter: its importance in sustainable agriculture and carbon dioxide inuxes. Advances in Agronomy 101: 157.

Kumar, D., Singh, M., Kumar, S., Meena, R.K. and Kumar, R. 2021. Fodder quality and nitrate estimation of oats grown under different nutrient management options. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 74(4): 331337.

Meena, H., Singh, M.K., Meena, R. and Meena, R.N. 2019. Effect of seed rate and integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and economics of direct-seeded hybrid rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agronomy 64(3): 324329.

Nalini, N., Vani, K.P., Devi, K.B.S. and Babu, P.S. 2020. Effect of integrated nutrient-management and dates of sowing on nutrient uptake and yield of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Indian Journal of Agronomy 65(3): 331336.

Pandey, K.C. and Roy, A.K. 2011. Forage Crops Varieties. p. 16. ICAR Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh India.

Pandey, M. 2018. Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield, quality and uptake of nutrients in oat (Avena sativa) in alluvial soil. Annals of Plant and Soil Research 20(1): 16.

Prasad, R., Shivay, Y.S., Kumar, D. and Sharma, S.N. 2006. Learning by Doing Exercises in Soil Fertility (A practical manual for soil fertility). p. 68. Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricutlural Research Institute, New Delhi.

Rathod, D.D., Rathod, P.H., Patel, K.P. and Patel, K.C. 2013. Integrated use of organic and inorganic inputs in wheat-fodder maize cropping sequence to improve crop yields and soil properties. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 59(11): 14391455.

Richards, L.A. 1968. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture Handbook 60: 210220.

Saleem, M., Zamir, M.S.I., Haq, I., Irshad, M.Z., Khan, M.K., Asim, M., Zaman, Q., Ali, I., Khan, A. and Rehman, S. 2015. Yield and quality of forage oat (Avena sativa L.) cultivars as affected by seed inoculation with nitrogenous strains. American Journal of Plant Sciences 6: 3,2513,259.

Singh, M.K., Singh, R.N., Singh, S.P., Yadav, M.K. and Singh, V.K. 2010. Integrated nutrient management for higher yield, quality and profitability of baby corn (Zea mays). Indian Journal of Agronomy 55(2): 100104.

Singh, P., Benbi, D.K. and Verma, G. 2020. Nutrient management impacts on nutrient use efficiency and energy, carbon, and net ecosystem economic budget of a ricewheat cropping system in Northwestern India. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 21: 559577.

Swaminathan, C., Swaminathan, V. and Vijayalakshmi, K. 2007. Panchagavya - boon to organic farming. pp. 194. International Book Distributing Co., Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Vejan, P., Abdullah, R., Khadiran, T., Ismail, S. and Boyce, A.N. 2016. Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability A review. Molecules 21(5): 573589.

Vennila, C., Sankaran, V.M. and Ananthi, T. 2019. Effect of integrated nutrient management on productivity and economics of bajra napier hybrid grass (Pennisetum purpureum Pennisetum glaucum). Indian Journal of Agronomy 64(2): 232237.

Yes Bank. 2018. Making Indian Dairy Farming Competitive The Small Farmer Perspective. pp. 1115. Food and Agribusiness Research Management, Yes Bank. February 2015.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

DINESH KUMAR, MAGAN SINGH, MANISH KUSHWAHA, GOVIND MAKARANA, & M.R. YADAV. (2001). Integrated use of organic and inorganic nutrient sources influences the nutrient content, uptake and nutrient use efficiencies of fodder oats (Avena sativa). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 66(4), 466-473. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v66i4.2875