Stress management in rainfed Bt. cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) through foliar sprays

Authors

  • B.V. ASEWAR
  • M.S. PENDKE
  • S.H. NARALE
  • K.A. GOPINATH
  • G. RAVINDRA CHARY

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v66i3.2860

Keywords:

Chlorophyll, Dry spell, Potassium nitrate, Normalized difference vegetative index, Relative water content

Abstract

In India, Bt cotton is grown on 122 Lakh ha area with production of 361 lakh bales and productivity is of 501 kg lint/ha. In Maharashtra it is grown on 41 lakh ha area with productivity of 81 lakh bales and productivity is 334 kg lint/ha. Cotton is grown on large scale under rainfed condition in Marathwada region of Maharashtra State and is a preferred cash crop in Kharif season by marginal as well as large farmers. The productivity of rainfed cotton par- ticularly in Marathwada region is uncertain due to occurrence of frequent dry spells particularly during July to Sep- tember. Hence to overcome the moisture stress under such dry spells condition and to obtain the sustainability in productivity, the measures like foliar application of potassium nitrate, water spray and other micronutrients are es- sential for reducing the rate of evapotranspiration. The experiment was conducted during 2017 to 2019 on experi- mental farm of All India Coordinated Research Project on Dryland Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. Study resulted that application of foliar spray of KNO (30 and 60 days after sowing) was 3 significantly superior in respect of increase in cotton yield as well as Net Returns as compared to the other treat- ments. Similarly, application of foliar spray during dry spell was also found superior than application of foliar spray after release of dry spells. The chlorophyll content, percent RWC and NDVI were also found higher under applica- tion of foliar spray which reflected in enhancing Bt. cotton productivity.

References

Barrs, H.D. and Weatherly, P.E. 1962. A re-examination of relative

turgidity for estimating water deficits in leaves. Australian

Journal of Biological Sciences 15: 413428.

Table 3. Mean RWC, Chlorophyll content and NDVI 30 days after sowing under various treatments

Treatment % RWC Chlorophyll content NDVI

T1 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2

F1, Urea @ 1% 100.80 129.50 42.32 42.38 0.785 0.835

F2, Urea @ 2% 102.80 128.72 42.19 42.49 0.781 0.826

F3, Water soluble complex Fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% 117.2 136.54 43.22 43.38 0.812 0.825

F4, Water soluble complex Fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% + 160.20 159.20 44.48 43.01 0.801 0.838

recommended dose of micronutrient

F5, Recommended dose of micronutrient 148.52 152.30 42.42 42.38 0.842 0.819

F6, Water Spray 102.50 120.72 41.53 42.01 0.777 0.778

F7, KNO3 179.32 159.70 45.35 43.28 0.825 0.866

F8, Control (No spray of any material/water) 92.42 88.10 41.47 41.62 0.783 0.756

Table 4. Mean RWC, Chlorophyll content and NDVI 60 days after sowing under various treatments

Treatment % RWC Chlorophyll content NDVI

T1 T2 T1 T2 T1 T2

F1, Urea @ 1% 33.24 27.98 47.27 51.65 0.83 0.85

F2, Urea @ 2% 35.68 26.42 48.58 48.92 0.84 0.86

F3, Water soluble complex Fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% 47.14 32.39 49.94 51.16 0.85 0.87

F4, Water soluble complex Fertilizer (19:19:19) @ 0.5% + 60.32 40.12 51.86 50.62 0.85 0.85

recommended dose of micronutrient

F5, Recommended dose of micronutrient 51.38 33.62 48.92 48.38 0.85 0.85

F6, Water Spray 21.25 19.52 47.52 48.56 0.84 0.86

F7, KNO3 66.93 43.69 51.98 51.96 0.87 0.87

F8, Control (No spray of any material/water) 13.78 18.86 44.94 47.80 0.83 0.83

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research, Edn 2,

John Wiley & Sons, New York. Harphool Meena, Meena PKP and Kumhar BL. 2018. Enhancing productivity of Bt cotton through foliar fertilization under humid southern plain zone of Rajasthan. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 32(1): 7783.

Jyothi, T.V. and Hebsur NS. 2018. Effect of soil and foliar applied potassium fertilizers on yield, quality and economics of Bt cotton (Gossypium, hirsutum) in vertisol. Indian Journal of Agronomy 63(1): 9194.

Singh, Kulvir, Malik, Sudeep, Singh, Amandeep and Rathore, Pankaj 2016. Influence of foliar feeding of nutrients on growth yield attributes and seed cotton yield of American cotton. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 30(1): 6972.

Mata, C., Garcia, L. Lamattina. 2001. Nitric oxide induces stomatal closure and enhances the adaptive plant responses against drought stress. Plant Physiology 126(3): 1,1961,204.

Matin, MA, Brown, J.H. and Ferguson, H. 1989. Leaf water potential, relative water content and diffusive resistance as screening techniques for drought resistance in Barley. Agro Journal 81: 100105.

Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. 1967. Statistical methods for Agricultural Workers. ICAR, New Delhi.

Ravikiran, S., Halepyati, A.S., Pujari, B.T., Koppalakar, B.G. and Narayanarao, K. 2012. Effect of macro and soluble micronutrients on yield, uptake of nutrients, quality and economics of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under irrigation. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 25(4): 418422.

Roberts, R.K., Gersman, J.M. and Howard, D.D. 1999. Economics of using and adjuvant with foliar potassium nitrate (KNO3)

on cotton. The Journal of Cotton Science 3: 116121.

Santosh, U.N., Satyanarayan, Rao, Biradar, S.A., Desai, B.K., Halepyati, A.S. and Koppalkar B.G. 2016. Response of soil and foliar nutrition on Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Journal of Cotton Research and Development 30(2): 205

Seyyed, M.S. and Seyyed, A.N. 2014. Evaluation of foliar application effects of Zn and Fe on yield and its components of lentil (Lens culinaris, Medik), Iran. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences 4(2): 220225.

Shinde, A.K., Birari, S.P. and Jadhav B.B. 1994. Effect of potassium nitrate and urea on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 64(7): 490491.

Shinde, V.S., Deshmukh, L.S., Shinde, S.A. and Zade, K.K. 2009. Influence of rainwater management through different agrotechniques on yield, yield attributing characters and economics of cotton. Journal Cotton Research Development 23(1): 5155.

Shivamurthhy, D. and and Biradar, D.P. 2014. Effect of foliar nutrition on growth, yield attributes and seed-cotton yield of Bt cotton. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science 27(1): 5

Srinivasarao and Gopinath 2016. Resilient rainfed technologies for drought mitigation and sustainable food security. Mausam 67(1): 169181.

Waraich, EA, Ahmad, R, Raja GM, Ehsanullah Ahmad, A. and Nasir,

M. 2011. Response of foliar application of KNO3 on yield, yield components and lint quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(24): 5,4575,463.

Downloads

Published

2001-10-10

Issue

Section

Research Paper

How to Cite

B.V. ASEWAR, M.S. PENDKE, S.H. NARALE, K.A. GOPINATH, & G. RAVINDRA CHARY. (2001). Stress management in rainfed Bt. cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) through foliar sprays. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 66(3), 361-365. https://doi.org/10.59797/ija.v66i3.2860